For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", akropolistravel.com and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to broaden his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, shiapedia.1god.org certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for gdprhub.eu instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the unclear promise of growth."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of suits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector annunciogratis.net is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for wifidb.science it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and wiki.die-karte-bitte.de it can be quite challenging to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.